|
Assessments
Oral Presentation Rubric : Final
Assessment: Oral Presentation
|
Category
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Preparedness
|
Student
is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed.
|
Student
seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals.
|
The
student is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking.
|
Student
does not seem at all prepared to present.
|
Speaks
Clearly
|
Speaks
clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, and mispronounces no words.
|
Speaks
clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, but mispronounces one word.
|
Speaks
clearly and distinctly most ( 94-85%) of the time.
Mispronounces no more than one word.
|
Often
mumbles or can not be understood OR mispronounces more than one word.
|
Volume
|
Volume is
loud enough to be heard by all audience members throughout the presentation.
|
Volume is
loud enough to be heard by all audience members at least 90% of the time.
|
Volume is
loud enough to be heard by all audience members at least 80% of the time.
|
Volume
often too soft to be heard by all audience members.
|
Posture
and Eye Contact
|
Stands up
straight, looks relaxed and confident. Establishes eye contact with everyone
in the room during the presentation.
|
Stands up
straight and establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the
presentation.
|
Sometimes
stands up straight and establishes eye contact.
|
Slouches
and/or does not look at people during the presentation.
|
Enthusiasm
|
Facial
expressions and body language generate a strong interest and enthusiasm about
the topic in others.
|
Facial
expressions and body language sometimes generate a strong interest and
enthusiasm about the topic in others.
|
Facial
expressions and body language are used to try to generate enthusiasm, but
seem somewhat faked.
|
Very
little use of facial expressions or body language. Did not generate much
interest in topic being presented.
|
Comprehension
|
Student
is able to accurately answer almost all questions posed by classmates about
the topic.
|
Student
is able to accurately answer most questions posed by classmates about the topic.
|
Student
is able to accurately answer a few questions posed by classmates about the
topic.
|
Student
is unable to accurately answer questions posed by classmates about the topic.
|
Content
|
Shows a
full understanding of the topic.
|
Shows a
good understanding of the topic.
|
Shows a
good understanding of parts of the topic.
|
Does not
seem to understand the topic very well.
|
Stays on
Topic
|
Stays on
topic all (100%) of the time.
|
Stays on
topic most (99-90%) of the time.
|
Stays on
topic some (89%-75%) of the time.
|
It was
hard to tell what the topic was.
|
Time-Limit
|
Presentation
is 5-6 minutes long.
|
Presention is 4 minutes long.
|
Presentation
is 3 minutes long.
|
Presentation
is less than 3 minutes OR more than 6 minutes.
|
Research Report : Final
Assessment: Report
|
Category |
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Organization
|
Information
is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and subheadings.
|
Information
is organized with well-constructed paragraphs.
|
Information
is organized, but paragraphs are not well-constructed.
|
The
information appears to be disorganized. 8)
|
All
Expected Components Included
|
A clear
and concise introduction presents the characteristics of the disease, there
is a process illustrated that the students followed, and conclusions are
clearly drawn from the process and background information.
|
The
introduction is nearly complete. The process by which the students followed
is a little unclear. The conclusion does not
necessarily correlate with the process and background information.
|
The
introduction is not well organized. The process is unclear, and the
conclusions do not correlate with the process and background information.
|
The
introduction, process and conclusions are not satisfactory.
|
Correct
Disease Identification
|
Disease
is correctly identified.
|
A very
similar disease is identified.
|
A related
disease is identified, but shares few characteristics.
|
The
disease identified has no correlation with the correct disease.
|
Quality
of Information
|
Information
clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details
and/or examples.
|
Information
clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or
examples.
|
Information
clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given.
|
Information
has little or nothing to do with the main topic.
|
Mechanics
|
No
grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
Almost no
grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
|
A few
grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors.
|
Many
grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
|
Sources
|
All
sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in the desired
format.
|
All
sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but a few are
not in the desired format.
|
All
sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but many are
not in the desired format.
|
Some
sources are not accurately documented.
|
Classroom
Assessment Techniques
CAT 1: Directed Paraphrasing
Directed Paraphrasing would be a good way to assess students' ability to
summarize a lesson. For instance, before the bacteria lecture, I would go
through an example of paraphrasing with the students. Then I would lecture over
the first few topics in bacteria, stop, and ask them to paraphrase what I just
lectured. I would lecture for a few more minutes, probably about five minutes at
a time, stopping to let them paraphrase that portion of the lecture in a few
sentences. At the end of the lecture, I would have the students get in groups
and combine their ideas of how to paraphrase the lesson into one, so that they
can see how many different ways one lecture can be summarized. With all the
different views, they will hopefully be able to see what the best way to
paraphrase the lecture would be.
CAT 2: Project Prospectus
The project prospectus is a good way to help the students prepare for their
final assessment which is a group project. The group project would represent a
large portion of the students' grades and also requires a greater percentage of
in class time to complete. Each of the groups can turn in one prospectus which
the teacher can then evaluate. By turning the prospectus after the first day of
research, the teacher can quickly head off any problems that he or she might
think will arise. The prospectus will also help the students organize their
time, since they will be performing research over an extended number of class
periods.
CAT 3: Problem Recognition Tasks
The students will be working on medical case studies in groups for their
final project in our lesson unit. To prepare them for their project, we can use
Problem Recognition Tasks by presenting student with several mini medical cases
to see where they are in their ability to use what they have learned in class
to diagnose the diseases. Students will also be asked to provide justifications
for their responses which would help the teachers see where they are in their
line of thinking.
CAT 4: Empty Outlines
In this assessment the teacher goes through the lesson prior
to teaching and creates an outline. The teacher then omits portions of this
self-created outline and provides it to the students to fill out after the
lesson. These "empty outlines" can be looked at by the teacher to see
where students are struggling to grasp the main ideas.
In the lesson on the overview of the immune system, this assessment is ideal
because it checks to see if students are seeing the big picture. Students will
be hearing new concepts, and it is important that they keep track of what's
going on since the immune system concepts build off each other. The teacher can
look at the outlines after class to see if clarification is necessary before
the next lesson.
|