|
Assessments in the Baseball project
Productive Study-Time Logs
For Assessing Course-Related Learning and Study Skills, Strategies, and
Behaviors, the Productive Study-Time Logs would be the most beneficial CAT
for our project. When working in groups, the issue of time-off-task arises
frequently. To combat this problem, the Study-Time Logs would come in handy.
Students could be required to fill one out at the end of each lab session to
identify how much time was spent on task and on what specific topics.
However small, this could provide some structure and goals for students to
meet while working on the Baseball project.
Self Assessment of Ways of Learning
In Assessing Students' Self-Awareness as Learners, I feel that the
Self-Assessment of Ways of Learning CAT would be the most beneficial for our
project. In our baseball project, students will be often times working in
cooperative groups and must be able to solve and model mathematical
situations in various ways. It would be nice to know the different learning
styles of the students so that appropriate groups can be made to maximize
learning. This CAT would also allow me to select certain activities and
approaches to teaching a lesson according to certain students' learning
styles.
Everyday Ethical Dilemmas
The Everyday Ethical Dilemmas CAT would be especially interesting and
useful in our Baseball project. The topic of cheating, especially the use of
steroids in baseball, has been a topic of much debate and controversy over
the past few years. Students could anonymously write about their feelings
towards cheating and steroid abuse in baseball and in general life. Students
could discuss how players using illegal, performance enhancing drugs affect
areas of mathematics such as probability, statistics, baseball trajectories
(quadratics) and various areas of biology and chemistry.
Project Prospectus
I would use the Project Prospectus for our Baseball project. During this
project, students will be confronted with the task of designing a ballpark,
selecting a player roster, modeling flights of balls, and the like. In each
situation, it will be beneficial for students to make a Project Prospectus
so as to identify tasks that need to be accomplished as well as areas they
need help in. This CAT, in my opinion, serves as a check to keep students
accountable, organized, and on track in order to finish the required parts
of the project.
Documented Problem Solutions
The Documented Problem Solutions is great for assessing problem solving
skills in our baseball lesson. Students will have to take their knowledge of
mathematics in their textbooks and apply it to various problems regarding
baseball. In many cases there will not be a "correct" answer to a problem
but rather a mathematically correct approach to an answer to a problem. This
CAT will help me, as a teacher, identify where students are weak in their
math skills and in their problem solving skills.
Concept Map
A concept map would be an effective CAT for our Baseball project.
Students could complete a concept map after completing different sections of
our project. For example, after working on building a player roster or
modeling flights of balls, students would make a concept map with themes
such as linear functions, quadratic functions, the graphs of these
functions, statistics and the sort. The concept maps will enable students to
look back at the concepts learned and notice how each is/is not tied to one
another.
Misconception/Preconception Check
I would use the Misconception/Preconception Check CAT for my project.
Mathematical topics that will be covered include linear and quadratic
functions, areas, volumes, probability and elementary statistics. It is
important that I quickly identify what students know/don't know so optimize
my limited instructional time. I don't want to hammer away at a probability
concept if students already know it and I don't want to rush through
functions if students are weak in this area.
MATHEMATICS FINAL PROJECT RUBRIC
Daniel FitzPatrick, Philip Flip Kromer, and Jonathan
Lopez-Hoffman
|
4 points - A |
3 points - B |
2 points - C |
0 to1 points - D or F |
Attendance and Use of Class Time (20%) |
Shows up and is ready to work almost
every day. Notifies instructor beforehand of necessary absences. Student
stays focused on project during class. Student meets all intermediate
deadlines. |
Shows up most of the time with at most
two unexcused absences. Student is occasionally off task and not always
prepared to work. Some intermediate deadlines slip. |
Shows up occasionally and with three or more unexcused
absences. Student is routinely off task and unprepared to work. Many
intermediate deadlines are not met. |
Rarely or never shows up to class.
Student is completely unproductive during class time. |
Final Project Report (40%) |
Report communicates technical ideas
clearly and with appropriate terminology. All ideas and decisions are
justified with mathematical evidence and reasoning. Thoughts are well
organized, and paper adheres to grammar and style guidelines. |
Report is unclear in places but for the
most part hangs together. Occasional gaps in mathematical reasoning.
Some typographical and grammatical errors persist. |
Report is difficult to follow and
demonstrates poor command of subject matter. Mathematical ideas are used
sparingly as evidence to claims. A significant amount of grammatical and
stylistic mistakes are present. |
Report is plagiarized or has no
mathematical content. |
Project Presentation (40%) |
Presentation clearly
demonstrates mathematical expertise behind decision making. Students
deliver a well prepared and interesting presentation, and handle
questions competently. Work is rich with mathematical ideas. |
Presentation is not always
clear in some areas and lacks some mathematical ideas. Students’
presentation reveals gaps in content, preparation or style. Work is
competent but limited. |
Presentation is difficult to
follow and lacks significant mathematical ideas. Students are ill
prepared and have no visual aids. Students fail to demonstrate content
mastery. |
Presentation contains no
mathematical ideas and students are completely unprepared. |
BIOLOGY FINAL PROJECT RUBRIC
Daniel FitzPatrick, Philip Flip Kromer, and Jonathan
Lopez-Hoffman
|
4 points - A |
3 points - B |
2 points - C |
0 to1 points - D or
F |
Attendance and Use of
Class Time (20%) |
Shows up and is ready to
work almost every day. Notifies instructor beforehand of necessary
absences. Student stays focused on project during class. Student meets
all intermediate deadlines. |
Shows up most of the
time with at most two unexcused absences. Student is occasionally off
task and not always prepared to work. Some intermediate deadlines
slip. |
Shows up occasionally
and with three or more unexcused absences. Student is routinely off
task and unprepared to work. Many intermediate deadlines are not met. |
Rarely or never shows up
to class. Student is completely unproductive during class time. |
Final Project Report
(40%) |
Report communicates
technical ideas clearly and with appropriate terminology. All ideas
and decisions are justified with references to information that was
taught along with information through articles or outside resources.
Thoughts are well organized, and paper adheres to grammar and style
guidelines. |
Report is unclear in
places but for the most part hangs together.
There are some gaps in
the biological terminology or wrong reasoning is used as far as
biological concepts. Some typographical and grammatical errors
persist. |
Report is difficult to
follow and demonstrates poor command of subject matter. The student
does not demonstrate and adequate knowledge of the biology taught and
does not use it to back up their arguments in the final project. A
significant amount of grammatical and stylistic mistakes are present. |
Report is plagiarized or
has no real biological backing. |
Project Presentation
(40%) |
Presentation clearly
demonstrates a great knowledge of biological topics that pertain to
the body. Understands what it takes to maintain an athletes body and
what does into it internally and externally . Students deliver a well
prepared and interesting presentation, and handle questions
competently. Work is rich with biological ideas. |
Presentation is not
always clear in some areas and lacks some biological ideas or uses
them incorrectly. Students’ presentation reveals gaps in content,
preparation or style. Work is competent but limited. |
Presentation is
difficult to follow and lacks significant biological ideas. Basically
makes arguments with not much to back up them as far as the biology
goes. Students are ill prepared and have no visual aids. Students fail
to demonstrate content mastery. |
Presentation contains no
biological ideas and students are completely unprepared. |
|