Texas State Logo

Nuclear Energy: What is it good for?

Sean O'Leary, Ryan Searle, Annie Fitzgerald

Project Home
Anchor Video
Concept Map
Calendar
Lesson Plans
Final Assessment
Final Product Rubric
Resources
Letter to Parents
Modifications
Lehman Block Fall 08 Home

Grading:
75%- The Rubric.
25%- the outcome of the individual responsibilities divided on attached handout.

 

Class Debate : Nuclear Energy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group:     ________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

CATEGORY

4

3

2

1

Understanding of Topic

The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information forcefully and convincingly.

The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information with ease.

The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease.

The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.

Information

All information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.

Most information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.

Most information presented in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough.

Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually not clear.

Rebuttal

All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong.

Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong.

Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak.

Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant