|
Assessments
Description of formative
and summative assessments
- Projective
prospectus, classroom opinion poll-This assessment could be used when discussing
diets, to see how students really think about the new trends and see
how the debate has impacted their opinions.
- The
interest knowledge skills checklistcould be use to assess students' level of interest
in topics the unit will cover prior to starting the unit. The use of
this would be to emphasize the parts of the unit students are most interested
in, and de-emphasize those that the students have the most experience
in, or take those on a more in depth level, so as to avoid student boredom.
The more interested students are, the more they will learn and pay attention,
which would increase the success of the project.
- The
diagnostic learning logs would be great for students ready to analyze
their own skills as learners. Students would keep a log through the
entire project, to give themselves and the teacher feedback to improve
lessons and make sure students understand material. By keeping a journal
throughout the six weeks (or semester) students will be more aware of
their own strengths and weaknesses so they can properly prepare for
tests and not fall behind.
- The
Problem Recognition Task could be incorporated into the unit when considering
the consequences of certain diet deficiencies. Students would be presented
with symptoms and, using their new knowledge of diet/nutrition information,
they could come up with possible causes of the symptoms to diagnose.
- The
one-sentence summary technique would be a good way for students to synthesize
their knowledge of processes such as respiration and photosynthesis,
which are both included in our unit. They would have to use one sentence
to link all of the steps, which would give them a cohesive overview
of a more complex topic. I think it would help them recall the overall
ideas of each in the future.
- The
"pro and con" grid would fit perfectly into the debate section of
our unit that has students look at diets that have been designed and
debate on whether they would work and be healthy. In a pro and con grid,
students would be able to get their ideas down in an organized system.
This will help them to learn how to evaluate issues in other realms
as well by sitting down and logically thinking about the ramifications
of such issues by considering both positive and negative aspects. It
is a skill critical to functioning in a social context, so students
can carry this into the world and be able to make more informed choices.
- memory matrix assessment technique would be another
good way to start off the 6 weeks to recap the cell structures that
students have already learned and to build on with the cell membrane,
which is a new topic. Each organelle would have its own line, with "structure"
and "function" being two headings to fill in for each organelle.
The students would fill the chart in as best they can, and then whatever
they are not clear on can be recovered as needed for the cell nutrition
unit. They could then take the chart and build on it with the membrane
and larger organs that fit into the nutrition unit.
Project Grading Rubric
Background
Research (due at end of week 1):
- presented in APA format
with correct grammar
-
sufficient
to make informed choices, including (but not limited to):
- meal worm
dietary needs
-
meal
worm anatomy
10 points possible
Project
Design Plan (due at end of week 2)
-
Procedure
-
Materials
-
Hypothesis
-
Potential
methods of data collections and analysis
-
Proposed
diet (based on research)
20 points possible
Project
Implementation (done in shifts by group; each group does this for 1
week)
- Group diet selection
- Data
collection
- Feeding worms
- Participation
10 points possible
Data
and Analysis
-
Log
books complete
- Statistical analysis of
data; are the worms in each group really different?
20 points possible
Conclusion
-
Synthesis
of results; back your conclusion with the data you've collected
-
Include
any confounding variables
10 points possible
Presentation
-
Content:
cover all pertinent material (procedure ˆ conclusion)
-
Clarity
(target towards someone with no biology background)
-
Communication
Style (use whatever format you think best fits!)
30 points possible
|