Building a Catapult

by Stephen Alwon and Sherwin Fernandes

Introduction

Anchor Video

Concept Map

Project Calendar

Lesson Plans

Letter to Parents

Assessments

Resources

Modifications

Grant

Description

 

Mathematics in AISD is taught for the most part as a series of lectures disparate from everything else the students learn in their other classes.  In using a project based around designing a catapult, students will be able to see mathematics come to life in a manner that brings together physics, engineering, and history in a way that they have not seen before.  The students will participate in a series of labs during which they will construct both the basic theory of projectile motion and the basic principles and behavior of quadratic functions.  Students will then be able to put their knowledge to use by building a working catapult and rationalizing how far it will launch a ball.  Through this project, the students will be able to bring together mathematics and physics in a manner that will enable them to solve a problem that has been around for thousands of years, giving them a historical background for their project.  Additionally, the students will have a working knowledge of the basic concepts of physics, allowing them to be better prepared when they enter a physics course.  Finally, the project will be fun, and will encourage students to think deeply about mathematics because they want to, not just in order to pass a test or so they can graduate.

Driving Question

 

What’s the most efficient way to launch a catapult?

 

Overall Goals/Project Objectives

 

Our project will attempt to get students interested in mathematics by bringing other disciplines into the mathematics classroom.  In this way, students will be able to see how mathematics can relate to subjects they most likely will not have seen a connection to before, such as history.  Students will be motivated to learn the mathematics not necessarily just to learn math, pass a test, or graduate high school, but as a way to better understand how history was shaped for hundreds of years.  Students whose primary scholastic interests were in social studies before participating in the project will have a different outlook on mathematics and the ways it can be used.  In this way, these students will have a new appreciation for mathematics and will be more excited to participate in math classes in the future.  Conversely, students whose main interests lie in the sciences will have a new outlook on history, and will be more excited to participate in those classes.  Our project will also prepare students for when they take physics by introducing them to some of the more basic concepts they will learn in that class.  This will enable the teacher who has these students to save time in covering some of the basic concepts, and instead allow them to spend more time on the concepts that the students have not been presented previously.

Rationale

 

One of the main problems with the way mathematics is taught in AISD is that it is taught in a vacuum, with rarely any connection being made between the mathematics classroom and any other class they are taking.  Students are made to forget everything they learned during the previous hour and start entirely fresh when they enter their mathematics class.  With this project, students will bring together concepts from various subjects such as engineering, physics, and history while they are learning mathematics.  The problem of how to best launch a projectile is one that has been around for hundreds of years, and students will be able to see this problem come to life in their world history class.  The ability to bring together mathematics and history will encourage students who are interested in either subject to seek out the other.  Students will discover how wars were fought for thousands of years, making the problem of how to build a working one relevant to students who enjoy history and social studies, while students who enjoy mathematics and the sciences will be able to see the social studies in a new light.  The project will also introduce students to the engineering process, from learning the necessary physics and mathematics to designing and constructing a working catapult.

Background

 

Projectile motion is an easily observable phenomenon, but requires knowledge of energy and trigonometry to understand. The building of a projectile launcher is one that is engaged in by many people in amateur competitions around the country. This project will allow students to study the mathematical and physical concepts that go into building a projectile launcher, and eventually build their own for the purpose of striking a target a set distance away.

This project focuses on the most efficient way to launch a projectile, and students will eventually calculate which launcher is the most efficient (which utilized the greatest percentage of its potential energy in accomplishing the task of hitting the target).

Students will begin the project by learning how to calculate stored or potential energy in springs, gravity and then kinetic energy. They will compare the energy in a spring with extension and the variation of energy with speed.

They will then plot the horizontal and vertical position of a falling ball and use that to derive the equations of motion. Stroboscope pictures of a falling ball will be used to plot each component versus time.

The division of a force into its vertical and horizontal components will then be investigated using similar triangles for a derivation of sine and cosine functions. A single fixed angle triangle will first be used to show that the angle is proportional to the side lengths. The angle will then be varied and the ratio recorded. The graph of the ratios versus the angle will show the sine, cosine and tangent functions.

Using these concepts, students will decide on which design of launcher would be best, design and make predictions for it. When the design is approved, students will construct the actual model from an erector set and test their launchers.

 

Standards Addressed

TEKS

(a) (3) Functions, equations, and their relationship. The study of functions, equations, and their relationship is central to all of mathematics. Students perceive functions and equations as means for analyzing and understanding a broad variety of relationships and as a useful tool for expressing generalizations.

      (5) Tools for algebraic thinking. Techniques for working with functions and equations are essential in understanding underlying relationships. Students use a variety of representations (concrete, numerical, algorithmic, graphical), tools, and technology, including, but not limited to, powerful and accessible hand-held calculators and computers with graphing capabilities and model mathematical situations to solve meaningful problems.

(b)  (2) The student understands the importance of the skills required to manipulate symbols in order to solve problems and uses the necessary algebraic skills required to simplify algebraic expressions and solve equations and inequalities in problem situations. Following are performance descriptions.

(A) The student uses tools including matrices, factoring, and properties of exponents to simplify expressions and transform and solve equations.

(B) The student uses complex numbers to describe the solutions of quadratic equations.

(C) The student connects the function notation of y = and f(x) =.

(c)  (1) The student connects algebraic and geometric representations of functions. Following are performance descriptions.

(A) The student identifies and sketches graphs of parent functions, including linear (y = x), quadratic (y = x2), square root (y = Ö x), inverse (y = 1/x), exponential (y = ax), and logarithmic (y = logax) functions.

(B) The student extends parent functions with parameters such as m in y = mx and describes parameter changes on the graph of parent functions

(d) Quadratic and square root functions: knowledge and skills and performance descriptions.

(1) The student understands that quadratic functions can be represented in different ways and translates among their various representations. Following are performance descriptions.

(A) For given contexts, the student determines the reasonable domain and range values of quadratic functions, as well as interprets and determines the reasonableness of solutions to quadratic equations and inequalities.

(B) The student relates representations of quadratic functions, such as algebraic, tabular, graphical, and verbal descriptions.

(C) The student determines a quadratic function from its roots or a graph.

(2) The student interprets and describes the effects of changes in the parameters of quadratic functions in applied and mathematical situations. Following are performance descriptions.

(A) The student uses characteristics of the quadratic parent function to sketch the related graphs and connects between the y = ax2 + bx + c and the y = a(x - h)2 + k symbolic representations of quadratic functions.

(B) The student uses the parent function to investigate, describe, and predict the effects of changes in a, h, and k on the graphs of y = a(x - h)2 + k form of a function in applied and purely mathematical situations.

(3) The student formulates equations and inequalities based on quadratic functions, uses a variety of methods to solve them, and analyzes the solutions in terms of the situation. Following are performance descriptions.

(A) The student analyzes situations involving quadratic functions and formulates quadratic equations or inequalities to solve problems.

(B) The student analyzes and interprets the solutions of quadratic equations using discriminants and solves quadratic equations using the quadratic formula.

(C) The student compares and translates between algebraic and graphical solutions of quadratic equations.

(D) The student solves quadratic equations and inequalities.

NCTM

Instructional programs from prekindergarten through grade 12 should enable all students to--

  • build new mathematical knowledge through problem solving;
  • solve problems that arise in mathematics and in other contexts;
  • apply and adapt a variety of appropriate strategies to solve problems;
  • monitor and reflect on the process of mathematical problem solving.

Instructional programs from prekindergarten through grade 12 should enable all students to--

  • understand patterns, relations, and functions;
  • represent and analyze mathematical situations and structures using algebraic symbols;
  • use mathematical models to represent and understand quantitative relationships;
  • analyze change in various contexts.

National Technology Standards

Students use technology to locate, evaluate, and collect information from a variety of sources.

Students use technology resources for solving problems and making informed decisions.

Students practice responsible use of technology systems, information, and software.

Formative and Summative Assessments

Our project will depend on two main techniques for measuring the progress of our students.  The first will be the labs and homeworks which will be assigned on a regular basis.  The labs will be done mostly in class, with the students able to finish outside if necessary.  Through these, the students will be able to witness first hand the physical and mathematical concepts they are to learn, and successful completion of the lab write-ups will depend on them thoroughly understanding the concepts the labs are designed to exhibit.  These will let us know that the students are working during class time and that their work is productive.  The homeworks will be designed to evaluate the concepts that are more mathematical in nature – problems such as finding quadratic roots.  These will enable us to quickly judge if the students are “getting” the mathematical concepts involved in the project.  The other evaluation technique will be through the final project itself – each group’s design of the catapult and their rationale of why their catapult works and how far they expect it to shoot.  This will allow us to determine how well the students brought together all of the concepts involved and how well they are able to communicate their knowledge of those concepts.  Below is the rubric for the grading of the final project.

Assessment

 

Side by side comparison  of launchers

 

5

 

 

Efficiency calculations for each design

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

Design

 

Measurement and sketching of available  parts

 

10

 

 

Identification of required parts and cost analysis

 

10

 

 

Blueprint

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction

 

Matches blueprint

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

Functionality

 

Able to launch ball

 

10

 

 

Hits target

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

Presentation

 

Dressed appropriately, everyone participates

 

5

 

 

Explains and justifies the design of the catapult

 

10

 

 

Discusses how the design was modified from the original plan

 

5

 

 

Discusses how the design could further be improved

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

Write Up (individual)

 

Turned in on time

 

5

 

 

Assess the design of your catapult, how you could have done things differently, and any problems you ran into during the design

 

15

 

 

Assessment of the members of your group, including yourself

 

5