Review Elements of a Paper
AUTHOR’s
NAME: Stephen Openshaw
TITLE
OF THE LESSON:
Review
Elements of a Paper
TECHNOLOGY
LESSON (circle one):
No
DATE
OF LESSON:
October
31, 2008
LENGTH
OF LESSON:
50
Minutes
NAME
OF COURSE:
English
II
SOURCE
OF THE LESSON:
Wendy’s original lesson on the elements of a paper.
TEKS
ADDRESSED:
(15) Writing/Expository and
Procedural Texts.
Students write expository and procedural or work-related texts to
communicate ideas and information to specific audiences for specific
purposes. Students are expected to:
(A) write
an analytical essay of sufficient length that includes:
(i) effective
introductory and concluding paragraphs and a variety of sentence
structures;
(ii) rhetorical
devices, and transitions between paragraphs;
(iii) a
thesis or controlling idea;
(iv) an
organizing structure appropriate to purpose, audience, and context;
(v) relevant
evidence and well-chosen details; and
(vi) distinctions
about the relative value of specific data, facts, and ideas that
support the thesis statement;
CONCEPT
STATEMENT:
The
structure of a paper consists of five paragraphs.
They are the introduction, three body paragraphs, and the
conclusion.
The paper should contain an opening statement, a thesis
statement, topic sentences, supporting points, restated thesis
statement, and a conclusion.
PERFORMANCE
OBJECTIVES:
-
Students
will review the structure of a five paragraph essay.
-
Students
will analyze a fellow student’s paper to identify the elements of a
paper.
-
Students
will use constructive criticism from their teacher and peers to revise
a draft of a paper.
RESOURCES:
SAFETY
CONSIDERATIONS:
SUPLEMENTARY MATERIALS, HANDOUTS:
-
Pens
-
Paper
-
Student Rough
Drafts
-
Overhead Projector
-
Overhead of a
sample paper
-
Overhead marker
Engagement
|
|
Time:
________
|
What the Teacher Will
Do
|
Probing Questions
|
Student Responses
Potential
Misconceptions
|
Have a prompt written
on the board and ask the students to do a “quickwrite”.
The prompt reads
“Create a quick outline of a fairy tale that you remember form your
childhood.”
|
What was the
beginning, middle, and end of the tale you chose?
How are these
different parts of the story separated naturally in the story?
|
Varies depending on
which tale the students chose.
Once upon a time
opening, and a happily ever after ending.
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
Time:
________
|
What the Teacher Will
Do
|
Probing Questions
|
Student Responses
Potential
Misconceptions
|
Explain to students
that they will be identifying the elements of a sample paper
The sample papers the
will used will be the students’ rough drafts of the papers that they
are working on.
Break students up into
groups of three and have them trade papers so that no student has their
own work.
Ask students to
identify the parts of a paper that they recognize in the sample they
have.
Then ask each student
to share what elements they recognized with the original author of the
draft.
|
What elements did you
find in your sample paper?
Did the author of your
sample have all the correct elements of a paper?
What, if any, parts
was your sample missing?
Do you have any
suggestions for the author of your sample?
|
The author forgot to
include a conclusion.
The author did not
have clear thesis statement.
|
|
|
|
Explanation
|
|
Time:
________
|
What the Teacher Will
Do
|
Probing Questions
|
Student Responses
Potential
Misconceptions
|
Teacher will project,
with the overhead, a page from a rough draft of a paper written by a
student in another class.
Make sure that the
name author of the paper is concealed.
With and overhead
marker edit/critique the page by annotating on the text.
Model how to correctly
review a peer’s work. Explain what the students should be looking for
when they read a paper.
Ask if the students
understand how they are expected to review a person’s work.
|
Do you see why I made
this comment on this paper?
Do you see any
mistakes that I am correcting that you commonly make?
|
|
|
|
|
Elaboration
|
|
Time:
________
|
What the Teacher Will
Do
|
Probing Questions
|
Student Responses
Potential
Misconceptions
|
Have students stay in
their groups and keep the sample paper that have been analyzing.
Tell each student to
re-read the paper they have and look for things they think would help
improve the paper.
Students are asked to
create a list of comments that they think will be a useful critique of
the author’s paper.
Have the students give
their list of comments to the author of the paper.
Have a quick
discussion time between the reviewers and the authors.
|
What kinds of things
did you find in the paper you reviewed?
Did you agree with the
comments that your reviewer gave you?
Did the reviewer of
your paper have good explanations on why they made the comments they
made?
|
The author misspelled
a lot of words.
The author had a clear
thesis statement and followed the five paragraph form.
I didn’t agree the
comment my reviewer made but I did respect his explanations.
|
|
|
|
Evaluation
|
|
Time:
________
|
What the Teacher Will
Do
|
Probing Questions
|
Student Responses
Potential
Misconceptions
|
Students will revise
their own rough drafts using the feedback that they have received from
the teacher and their peers.
Ask students to bring
a copy of their revised drafts to class next time.
|
What kind of feedback
did you get from your peers?
Do you agree with this
feedback? Why or Why not?
|
I don’t agree with
feedback that I received from my classmate
|
|
|
|